WIREFRAME · non-functional design mockup · Ship-Broker Vessel-Sanctions & Charterparty Clearance · static illustrative data (Fixture VC-2026-0847)
Clearance-integrity score. Do not fix — OFAC 50% rule, not the screening flag.
USD 2.85M
Fixture value (freight)
Six adversarial checks
Charterparty Flag
Bespoke 2010-era sanctions clause; no BIMCO 2020 clause — weak right to refuse cleanly
Pre-fix condition
Commercial Flag
Demurrage: 138h used vs 72h allowed; SOF recompute supports $92.4K
−$75,600
Vessel-identity Flag
IMO consistent (not a false flag); re-flagged Panama→MI 8mo ago; 2 PSC detentions/18mo
Condition · PSC/class
Ownership Reject
Reg. owner screens clean; BO ~61% to OFAC-designated parent via HK→UAE — 50% rule (blocked property)
$2.85M exposed
Voyage-AIS Reject
14-day AIS gap + STS ~38nm off a sanctioned-adjacent region — dark-fleet pattern
Block · dark-fleet
Sanctions-adjudication Pass
World-Check hit on charterer → designation DELISTED 2024 / name mismatch — not a defensible basis to refuse (Tonzip)
Wrongful-refusal averted
Cards reveal in sequence during the demo. Green = pass (clear / do-not-refuse) · Amber = flag (condition before fixing) · Red = reject (decline & escalate). The decline rests on substantiated findings (Ownership, Voyage-AIS) — not the screening flag.
Exception report
| Subject | Check | Finding | Claimed | Supported | Delta | Source |
|---|
| Beneficial owner | Ownership | Reg. owner (MI SPV) screens clean; BO aggregates ~61% to an OFAC-designated parent via HK→UAE intermediaries → blocked property under the 50% rule | $2,850,000 | $0 | $2,850,000* | OFAC 50% Rule |
| Voyage history | Voyage-AIS | 14-day AIS gap (2026-02-09/23) + STS ~38nm off a sanctioned-adjacent region; re-flagged 8mo prior — dark-fleet typology | — | — | block | OFAC Maritime Advisory · AIS history |
| Vessel | Vessel-identity | IMO consistent (not a false flag); re-flagged Panama→Marshall Islands 8mo; 2 PSC detentions/18mo; P&I expiring | — | — | condition | Paris/Tokyo MOU · flag registry |
| Contract | Charterparty | Bespoke 2010-era sanctions clause; no BIMCO Sanctions Clause 2020 — weak contractual right to refuse/terminate | — | — | condition | BIMCO Sanctions Clause 2020 |
| Laytime | Commercial | Demurrage claimed on 138h used vs 72h allowed; SOF recompute = $92,400 | $168,000 | $92,400 | $75,600 | C/P laytime · SOF |
| Total at issue (value-integrity) | $2,925,600 | *fixture freight; + ~$47M cargo / fines exposure |
Recommended position
Export decision memo (PDF)
Send to Veson IMOS / case-file (stub)
Accept / override flags
Audit drawer (on click): Source = OFAC 50% Rule. Ownership chain: HK holdco (100%) → UAE free-zone co (61%) → OFAC-designated parent. Aggregate beneficial ownership ≥ 50% → the registered owner is blocked property. Decline & escalate. The World-Check hit on the charterer is delisted (2024) / a name mismatch — not a defensible basis to refuse (Tonzip [2025] EWHC 2036); the decline rests on ownership & the dark-fleet voyage pattern.
Desk trend — sanctions exposure
$61.4M
flagged across 186 fixtures screened YTD (the portfolio sanctions view the screening tools don't surface)
Bars = $ flagged per month · amber = above-threshold months.
Post-Tonzip (2025 EWHC), a screening flag alone isn't legally defensible — this is the documented adjudication that is.
Mockup only — illustrative figures, no live engine. Final figures come from the six-check engine per DESIGN-ship-brokers-fixture-sanctions-verification.md.